• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

114

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

114

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

114

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

114

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Mikä on selaimesi?