• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Mikä on selaimesi?