• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

End of game standings

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

End of game standings

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

End of game standings

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

End of game standings

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Mikä on selaimesi?