• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?