• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Mikä on selaimesi?