#110152: "implement a better default player order algorithm"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. -
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. -
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. -
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. -
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
Raportin historia
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.
