#115338: "allow players to lock in their split before others have discarded"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
Raportin historia
This would speed up the game without changing anyone's available information. Lean into the simultaneous action selection.
Unfortunately, the suggestion would require a sizeable rewrite of much of the game's code. Maybe doable in development or even alpha, but that was over a year ago.
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.
