#124173: "Randomize player order in a rematch"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v124
Raportin historia
Two player games should swap starting players on a rematch.
Multi-player games should rotate the starting player and randomize the player order. If rotating the starting player is too much to remember between games, randomizing the starting player (avoiding the previous starting player) is acceptable.
Rearranging seats at the table is totally something we do in real life if we're playing multiple short games.
In real life we use chwazi to determine player order for every game we play. In 7 wonders nobody likes to sit next to the player who likes heavy military and we all want to sit next to the pacifist.
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582
And this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41518
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.
