• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

I think that the game should have ranked losers, for example the winner, then 2nd place, 3rd place, 4th place.

In the table this report is about, two players have 7 points and the other two players had much lower points. But there was only 1 winner and everyone else was tied for 2nd, when one loser was clearly better than the rest. For a one round game everyone should be ranked by how many points they scored.

This would help reflect a better ELO of players, as well as arena standings in games with more than 2 players.

• Mikä on selaimesi?