Kaikki raportit
Inside Job raportit
#172376: "Random roles"
implemented: Tämä ehdotus on toteutettu
1
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ehdotus: Mielestäni seuraava seikka parantaisi pelin toteutusta huomattavasti
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Would be nice to have an option added to have a random roles option for role 1 and 2.
Could be nice feature to play on arena or tournaments to have a variaty on roles and not always play with the same roles.
Then you can have a fixed role 1 and a random role 2.
Or random role 1 and role 2 on none.
Then arena can have some changed formats what could be cool. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v137
Raportin historia
12. Jun 2025 9:31 • arrie1987 • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
Would be nice to have an option added to have a random roles option for role 1 and 2.
Could be nice feature to play on arena or tournaments to have a variaty on roles and not always play with the same roles. Or also on a single play that you randomise the roles.
Then you can have a fixed role 1 and a random role 2 for example.
Or random role 1 and role 2 on none.
Then arena for example can have some changed formats what could be cool.
Could be nice feature to play on arena or tournaments to have a variaty on roles and not always play with the same roles. Or also on a single play that you randomise the roles.
Then you can have a fixed role 1 and a random role 2 for example.
Or random role 1 and role 2 on none.
Then arena for example can have some changed formats what could be cool.
12. Jun 2025 16:13 • Mizutismask • Kehittäjien mielestä tämä ei ole hyvä ajatus tai vaivaa suhteessa hyötyyn on liikaa:
Random is not suitable here, because some couples don’t play well together, and some are not even allowed. Look at the rules to see how they match to make an interesting game.
16. Jun 2025 1:47 • Thomas • Kehittäjien mielestä tämä ei ole hyvä ajatus tai vaivaa suhteessa hyötyyn on liikaa:
I understand, that some combinations don’t play well. As you suggested, I read the rulebook, and it say:
„We recommend using only one special role card per game in the beginning and a maximum of two as you become more and more familiar with how to play using them. If you incorporate two special role cards, it is important to avoid choosing two roles that are revealed at the start of the game (Bugged Agent, The Accomplice) or have two NEUTRAL roles (The Decoy, The Accomplice, Tim Shady) in play.“
Taking that in kind, it should be possible to
1. play without special roles. (already possible)
2. play with 1 or 2 special roles, selected by the table creator. (already possible)
3. play with 1 special role, selected randomly.
4. play with Prof. No (instead of the Insider) and 1 random special roles.
5. play with 2 special roles, selected randomly, but with the following restrictions:
a) if the first role is Bugged Agent, the second must not be The Accomplice.
b) if the first is The Accomplice, the second must not be Bugged Agent.
c) if the first is a neutral role, the second must not be a neutral role.
That should ensure, that any random combinations of two special roles respect the restriction of the offical rulebook.
This could not avoid, that some combinations will make it easier for the agents or the insider to win, but the rulebook says that we should „try different combinations to find out which ones you have the most fun with.“ As it is up to the table creator to create a table with 2 random special roles, he/she should be aware of the risk, that a random combination can change balance between agents and insider.
But even if you don’t want to implement an option to use 2 random special roles, I don’t see any reason, why not at least allow an option to play with just 1 single random role.
„We recommend using only one special role card per game in the beginning and a maximum of two as you become more and more familiar with how to play using them. If you incorporate two special role cards, it is important to avoid choosing two roles that are revealed at the start of the game (Bugged Agent, The Accomplice) or have two NEUTRAL roles (The Decoy, The Accomplice, Tim Shady) in play.“
Taking that in kind, it should be possible to
1. play without special roles. (already possible)
2. play with 1 or 2 special roles, selected by the table creator. (already possible)
3. play with 1 special role, selected randomly.
4. play with Prof. No (instead of the Insider) and 1 random special roles.
5. play with 2 special roles, selected randomly, but with the following restrictions:
a) if the first role is Bugged Agent, the second must not be The Accomplice.
b) if the first is The Accomplice, the second must not be Bugged Agent.
c) if the first is a neutral role, the second must not be a neutral role.
That should ensure, that any random combinations of two special roles respect the restriction of the offical rulebook.
This could not avoid, that some combinations will make it easier for the agents or the insider to win, but the rulebook says that we should „try different combinations to find out which ones you have the most fun with.“ As it is up to the table creator to create a table with 2 random special roles, he/she should be aware of the risk, that a random combination can change balance between agents and insider.
But even if you don’t want to implement an option to use 2 random special roles, I don’t see any reason, why not at least allow an option to play with just 1 single random role.
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
Lisää tähän mitä tahansa, minkä katsot oleelliseksi tämän bugin toisintamiseksi tai ehdotuksesi ymmärtämiseksi:
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
