• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Mikä on selaimesi?