Kaikki raportit
#19843: "Either disable "conceed" option OR allow to end the game after conceeding"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
BGA:n sivusto
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ehdotus: mielestäni tämä parantaa huomattavasti sivustoa
Tarkka kuvaus
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
As a Seasons player, I find VERY frustrating when an opponent conceed the game near the end. When we work hard on a draft and cannot play it, it removes all the fun of the game. To me, it's actually highly unfair-play to do that.
To fix this frustration, I see 2 options:
- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game• Mikä on selaimesi?
Not relevant
Raportin historia
26. kesä 2020 16:35 • compte obelète • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
30. kesä 2020 13:52 • Niluje • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
My last 40 Seasons game: 7 conceed: 86%, 60%, 97%, 86%, 77%, 100%, 97%
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
Those are just ragequit (except one who apologized doing this, the only one).
@TheClaudeQc I don't get why this would make players out.
2. joulu 2020 18:55 • Wicksweff • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
When you agree to a game, you should be agreeing to play it to completion.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
The Conceed feature should be changed into an Offer to Conceed, that can be accepted or rejected by the other player(s).
The current unilateral conceed option assumes that determining a winner is the only reason to play, but some people play for fun.
3. joulu 2020 1:16 • jda • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
I agree the current system is frustrating. Changing it to offer to concede would be good.
22. maalis 2021 12:06 • Maeves • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
i agree, you are thinking of your next move, and without notice, the game end because of conceed.
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
"offer to conceed" and let the other player accept or not will definitly arrange the problem
24. maalis 2021 19:14 • KongKing123 • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
No thanks. Forcing someone to play out a lost game just for your enjoyment is not the way to go.
27. marras 2022 13:46 • Wicksweff • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
If you agree to the game, you play to the end.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
Conceeding is the online equivalent of flipping the board.
27. marras 2022 15:58 • ufm • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
Qutting is equivalent to flipping the board. Not conceding.
27. marras 2022 16:05 • ufm • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
Conceding literally means 'admitting their defeat', not flipping the board or ragequitting. The game has ended.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
If you want to always play to the final move and scoring regardless the result, just create a group for that.
Players should not suffer from forcibly playing out games already clearly lost.
20. joulu 2023 2:05 • Cos- • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
I strongly favor the last option: Allow remaining player to finish the game if someone concedes.
3. helmi 2024 9:29 • pecan • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
For me, we have option to resign is the biggest advantage of 2-player game.
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
No matter for the situation of the game progress. (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=28862 is another suggestion to remove restriction with the timing)
So I downvote these 2 options.
>- table creator could fordbid "conceed" option, then players cannot conceed during the game (maybe it should forbid it only after X% of the game)
>- when a player want to conceed, other players vote for agreement
And :+1: for the last option, if it means to allow resignation with free timing even in 3+ player games.
>- when a player conceed, other players can "finish" the game, as it happens when a player leaves the game
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
Lisää tähän mitä tahansa, minkä katsot oleelliseksi tämän bugin toisintamiseksi tai ehdotuksesi ymmärtämiseksi:
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
