• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

In real-time games, it happens quiet frequently that a player is not playing because he did not receive the notification that it is his turn to play. It also happens that the game situation is screwed at his side only because of a lost notification.
It leads to wasted games and to many bug reports on games despite the game developer can not fix them.

Ideally, lost notifications should not exist (might be done using an acknowledgment to reissue a notification to a player if it browser did not acknowledge; normally TCP is doing it automatically at a lower level, I wonder if you are in UDP), but avoiding them would probably increase the server load.

At least, a mitigation for lost your turn notifications should be implemented: if a player is not playing for a given amount of time (either fixed or computed from average time needed to play in the game, or when going negative in time but that’s might be too late to reload and play without being expelled), a special framework specific "YourTurn" notification should be sent to its browser. When the browser receive it, the framework at client side should either:
- if it was knowing that the player should play (it has received the normal your turn notification), do nothing,
- if it was not knowing that the player should play, warn the player that he must reload the page (as the normal notification can have important lost data) and show a button to do it easily.

• Mikä on selaimesi?