#20752: "Cue bid should not be possible unless you hold the card that would be called"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
Raportin historia
(a) as first bidder you can bid whatever you like, but if someone else accepts the presumed invitation, you must bid on to indicate that it wasn't actually an invitation
(b) if you don't hold the required card for an invitation, you must bid 3, but nobody else bids, you are then allowed to take fewer than 3 if you wish
(c) if you don't hold the required card for an invitation, you must bid 3, and if nobody else bids you must take 3
The last variant is somewhat marginal, the other two are widespread. My implementation uses (a) on the basis that in (b) we make life easier for the player with a strong hand. Force them to make a decision instead: "do I want to risk getting too many trumps, discarding some, and then winning a game of little value OR getting even fewer cards than I'd like and possibly struggling in a higher value game?"
BTW there are (quite wordy) tooltips provided for bidding button explaining what exactly each bid means. If a bid isn't legal then its button won't show up - anything you do see is legal to say. Admitedly the tooltips won't help you if you're using a touchscreen.
(Also, if you're doing very little cue-bidding, you're doing the right thing. That's meant for strong hands where the two high honours have a good chance of winning a game of one or solo with at least trull, even against the pagat and the XX. Under 6 trumps you shouldn't even consider a cue bid, but I'm not sure I've done it more than once or twice even with 6.)
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.
