#42906: "non-adjacent capture follows opponent's non-capture"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
Yes. Move 29-30
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
Yes. Move 29-30
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Microsoft Edge
Raportin historia
> All your bugs which are adjacent to one or more enemy bugs of the same shape (but not necessarily the same orientation) must eat (capture) those enemy bugs
There is nothing here which says only the newest bug can eat, or that eating must happen after a bug is placed or grows. It's just based on adjacency and the possibility of being able to grow after!
We can probably help other users by updating the wiki rules to make this clear.
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
