• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• Mikä on selaimesi?