Kaikki raportit
#49340: "Tournament creates too many tables with minimum player count"
implemented: Tämä ehdotus on toteutettu
1
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
BGA:n sivusto
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ehdotus: mielestäni tämä parantaa huomattavasti sivustoa
Tarkka kuvaus
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
When creating a tournament for a multiplayer game, you can specify two quantities: the Number of Players in a Match and the Number of Players in a Match (minimum). When the tournament starts, it should create tables so that all players are playing (if possible) and most of the tables have the desired player count, not the minimum player count. Yet in many tournaments, I have seen that the algorithm creates far too many tables with the minimum (undesired) player count. A detailed example is below.• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
Raportin historia
27. syys 2021 16:59 • blockmonoid • Kehittäjät eivät ole vielä tutkineet tätä ehdotusta:
An example tournament: boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=89107
There were 81 players. The Number of Players in a Match was 4, the minimum was 3. So the optimal configuration would be:
18 four-player tables and 3 three-player tables (81= 4*18+3*3)
Instead, the first round of the tournament had:
9 four-player tables and 15 three-player tables (81= 4*9+3*15)
I don't even know how the algorithm decided on this configuration, since it shows no preference between 4- and 3-player tables. But the result was that an extra 36=3*12 players were playing at 3-player tables in the tournament, when they could have been at 4-player tables. For a game like For Sale, that's a big difference, since 4-player is a good player count, but 3-player is quite bad.
There were 81 players. The Number of Players in a Match was 4, the minimum was 3. So the optimal configuration would be:
18 four-player tables and 3 three-player tables (81= 4*18+3*3)
Instead, the first round of the tournament had:
9 four-player tables and 15 three-player tables (81= 4*9+3*15)
I don't even know how the algorithm decided on this configuration, since it shows no preference between 4- and 3-player tables. But the result was that an extra 36=3*12 players were playing at 3-player tables in the tournament, when they could have been at 4-player tables. For a game like For Sale, that's a big difference, since 4-player is a good player count, but 3-player is quite bad.
31. tammi 2023 11:16 • Archduke • Tämä ehdotus on toteutettu:
Implemented (release notes: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=133530#p133530)
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
Lisää tähän mitä tahansa, minkä katsot oleelliseksi tämän bugin toisintamiseksi tai ehdotuksesi ymmärtämiseksi:
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
