#57959: "Giving a maximum number of cards to be held"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? -
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? -
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? -
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? -
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? -
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? -
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Some gamers have a sort of strategy (impossible in a "real card" game) to continue drawing, reaching a very high number of cards and they play just a couple of times (thanks to the limit of 13 cards to be played at once. Otherwise they would probably wait to have all the cards...).
This is an online strategy, but this also means the other player usually plays alone, till the last 2 or 3 moves where all the cards of the first gamer are played (and the match is obviuosly lost, because the other did not play, but just organised his/her cards as in a solitary game).
With real cards this would be impossible. Maybe it could be good to set a max number of cards to be held (with some penalty if a gamer does not play a card in a number of moves, or something like that).
Is this just a feeling of mine? • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v97
Raportin historia
www.pagat.com/rummy/carousel.html#machiavelli
I won't add any other fancy rule.
The effect of this tactic is to drive away players who want to play and new players. Soon, these players will lose interest in the game because of the tactics of some.
Machiavelli Arena stats
Season Games. Players
S0 824 142
S1 3074 255
S2 2153 175
S3 1896 178
S4 3235 232
S5 2617 230
S6 1218 175
S7 884 160
S8 822 157
I fully agree with the complaints already made on this subject. Penalties do not exist in the real game and on the site, they were introduced to PENALIZE a player who does not respect the rules, but it turns out that in the end, they favor those who cheat!!! Couldn't we simply remove these penalties which completely divert the objective of the game, which in my opinion, is to improve one's strategy instead of seeking to win at all costs, in defiance of the rules of the game and one's opponents? ? Especially since when faced with this type of player, I systematically ask for the game to be abandoned, and this is systematically refused by the cheater!!!! They tell me that I just have to cheat too!!! I really like Machiavelli but it is more and more difficult to play "normally" and many of the "friends" I used to play with have abandoned the site for this reason....
The only addition is the 13 cards limit.
As Pagat says, "A general problem with manipulation rummy games is that laying down sets and runs helps the other players by giving them extra manipulation possibilities. The result is that players tend to hoard cards, waiting for others to meld, and hoping to go out by playing their whole hand at once. One solution to this problem is to limit the number of cards that can be played on one turn"...
There have been several changes made since the beginning (2013) and removing penalties doesn't prevent people from hoarding.
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
