#61868: "End scoring result seems incorrect"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? -
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1
As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".
So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?
But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
? • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v99
Raportin historia
Even though I ended with total score = 0, my Status still shows "get promoted to dead-end job", probably because I worked an extra shift (or the last shift?) in the last round.
The highest player only survives when the player is sole survivor or all surviving players perfectly tied.
My interpretation of the rules was that only players that worked too hard could get “promoted”.
This rule is quite relevant in multiplayer single round games, since players cannot bid 0 in single round games.
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
