• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

there are very few stone age games that go to tiebreak. right now, the rules state that the "tie break points" are the sum of people, tools and agriculture level, which indicates to me, that they were taken from the "middle huts" of the old game. with the expansion, the trading house was added to the middle huts, but the trading level does not count towards tie break. I think this should be changed.

• Mikä on selaimesi?