Kaikki raportit
Just One raportit
#67657: "Collective Voting"
acknowledged: Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ehdotus: Mielestäni seuraava seikka parantaisi pelin toteutusta huomattavasti
Tarkka kuvaus
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Have everyone vote to cancel a word and go with majority. This way if someone misses a match or was unsure, it would be caught by the table.• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v103
Raportin historia
10. heinä 2022 0:33 •
KuWizard • Kehittäjien mielestä tämä ei ole hyvä ajatus tai vaivaa suhteessa hyötyyn on liikaa:
10. heinä 2022 1:00 • That's how it was implemented as a first draft. People from publishing company (Repos Production) played with 7 players and decided that it kills the game pace and slows down it a lot. So they asked to do the next player verification only. Pretty sure they won't decide to change back
CaptainTenille • Kehittäjien mielestä tämä ei ole hyvä ajatus tai vaivaa suhteessa hyötyyn on liikaa:
10. heinä 2022 1:24 • so it's better to have duplicate clues got through?
Pompkin • Kehittäjien mielestä tämä ei ole hyvä ajatus tai vaivaa suhteessa hyötyyn on liikaa:
10. heinä 2022 6:51 • for live games it is easily fixed with a countdown timer of something like 10-15 seconds for all the cluegivers when the words are presented. If nobody clicks the duplicate/invalid clue button in that time game just progress as normal. It will both speed up the average waiting time for approving clues and increase the likelihood of catching errors.
KuWizard • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
10. heinä 2022 9:00 • Ok, timer could save the situation, I'll try to present this idea if more people vote for this one (it's just 1 vote at the moment)
CaptainTenille • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
10. heinä 2022 14:14 • Since it already has been implemented before, can't it just be an option when setting up the game? If the players want it, they just check the box and get the experience that they want.
Pompkin • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
11. heinä 2022 16:09 •
11. heinä 2022 16:10 • another problem with letting just 1 player approve of the clues is that they are very likely to improve one of their own clues that break the rules as they wouldnt give that rule breaking clue in the first place if they know the rules.
FT3 • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
28. heinä 2022 2:16 • I came here to make the same report, the countdown timer for everyone sounds like a very neat solution to the problem.
OutOfHabit • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
11. syys 2022 10:42 • I would love to see this change implemented, at least as an option .
Maybe an ability to mark a word as Wrong (X) or as Question (?) (and the rest are ok to keep)
Question lets the group know you want opinions about a word
Wrong (X) means you think it should go
Anyone can choose to just abstain from joining that part of they want,
And probably still on one person to submit it each time, rotating as it does now
Maybe an ability to mark a word as Wrong (X) or as Question (?) (and the rest are ok to keep)
Question lets the group know you want opinions about a word
Wrong (X) means you think it should go
Anyone can choose to just abstain from joining that part of they want,
And probably still on one person to submit it each time, rotating as it does now
Livini • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
26. loka 2022 14:27 • #311910257
A player cancelled a perfectly valid clue (Shrek) and didn't cancel two identical clues with different (British/American) spelling (Grey and Gray). Mistakes like this could have been avoided if we'd voted collectively.
A countdown timer would be great so it doesn't slow down the pacing!
A player cancelled a perfectly valid clue (Shrek) and didn't cancel two identical clues with different (British/American) spelling (Grey and Gray). Mistakes like this could have been avoided if we'd voted collectively.
A countdown timer would be great so it doesn't slow down the pacing!
MIB5799 • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
2. marras 2022 9:13 • Possible option: Have only 3 players do approval instead of all 6. Still much much better than only one.
Or even just 2 (with rotating tiebreaker like in Similo).
Or even just 2 (with rotating tiebreaker like in Similo).
bananasplay • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
14. joulu 2022 17:45 • Make this a table option when creating a game so that players can decide for themselves:
Next player's choice
Collective voting
Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).
Next player's choice
Collective voting
Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).
TheInquisitor • Kehittäjien mielestä idea on hyvä ja he aikovat työstää sitä:
7. maalis 2024 17:13 • > Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).
This option would be a great help for friends who are just playing the infinite game amongst themselves.
This option would be a great help for friends who are just playing the infinite game amongst themselves.
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
Lisää tähän mitä tahansa, minkä katsot oleelliseksi tämän bugin toisintamiseksi tai ehdotuksesi ymmärtämiseksi:
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.