• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Mikä on selaimesi?