Kaikki raportit
Medina raportit
#75126: "Watch tower tile not awarded to player when it should"
notabug: Tämä ei ole bugi
1
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Säännöt: pelin sääntöä ei ole noudatettu
Tarkka kuvaus
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
On move 238 red player put a wall piece next to the golden palace and yet was not awarded the watch tower 4 tile, even though it was the last to get a wall tile next to an own palace connected to that watch tower.
This bug caused me to lose the game since by winning the tower tile I would have gone over my opponent in points. Therefore I request that the final result of this game reflects the rules with me winning the match and receiving the correct amount of points to my game score.• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
Yes, on move 238.• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5
Raportin historia
3. marras 2022 21:45 • Tilt • Ohjelmoijat eivät ole vielä löytäneet bugia:
This goes against the official rule which states:
"If a player has a palace bordering a city wall space with a wall component and any player rebuilds this wall at a later point in time so that it borders this palace, the owner of the palace also receives the cor- responding tower tile."
Since I rebuilt the wall so that it bordered that palace again, I should have received the corresponding tower tile 4.
This bug caused me to lose the game since by winning the tower tile I would have gone over my opponent in points. Therefore I request that the final result of this game reflects the rules with me winning the match and receiving the correct amount of points to my game score.
"If a player has a palace bordering a city wall space with a wall component and any player rebuilds this wall at a later point in time so that it borders this palace, the owner of the palace also receives the cor- responding tower tile."
Since I rebuilt the wall so that it bordered that palace again, I should have received the corresponding tower tile 4.
This bug caused me to lose the game since by winning the tower tile I would have gone over my opponent in points. Therefore I request that the final result of this game reflects the rules with me winning the match and receiving the correct amount of points to my game score.
6. marras 2022 21:06 • Lymon Flowers • Tämä ei ole bugi:
Mr Dorra confirmed that the rules are OK :
"Everything is okay with tower tile 4. Blue put a wall on 0,8 and Red got the tower tile 4. Later Blue put a wall on 2,12 and now Blue got the tower tile 4.
Red didn't get the tower tile 4 if he put a wall on 0.7. because this palace was already connected. A palace gets a tower tile only at the first touch. "
Thanks for your interest in Medina.
Benjamin
"Everything is okay with tower tile 4. Blue put a wall on 0,8 and Red got the tower tile 4. Later Blue put a wall on 2,12 and now Blue got the tower tile 4.
Red didn't get the tower tile 4 if he put a wall on 0.7. because this palace was already connected. A palace gets a tower tile only at the first touch. "
Thanks for your interest in Medina.
Benjamin
6. marras 2022 21:42 • Tilt • Tämä ei ole bugi:
This contradicts the rules which states:
"If a player has a palace bordering a city wall space with a wall component and any player rebuilds this wall at a later point in time so that it borders this palace, the owner of the palace also receives the corresponding tower tile."
Let's break this down:
1) "If a player has a palace bordering a city wall space with a wall component ... "
If a player has a palace bordering a city wall space with a wall component that player should receive the tower tile as per the rules. That player may later lose that tower tile, as it happened w/ red in this game.
2) "... and any player rebuilds this wall *** at a later point in time so that it borders this palace ***..."
This too happened in this game, when after having lost the tower tile the red player rebuilt the wall again touching his palace for a second time.
3) "the owner of the palace also receives the corresponding tower tile."
Therefore the red player, after having rebuilt the wall "so that it borders this palace " (exactly as it is written in the rule) should "also receives the corresponding tower tile".
The implementation, as it stands, is not following part 2 above because it's not awarding the owner of the palace the corresponding tower tile when the wall is rebuilt AT A LATER POINT IN TIME SO THAT IT BORDERS THIS PALACE again.
If your interpretation were correct in that a palace that was already connected can't receive the tower tile again at a later point in time, the rules wouldn't clearly state "any player rebuilds this wall >>> at a later point in time <<< so that it borders this palace the owner of the palace also receives the corresponding tower tile".
I don't know how to better explain the obvious. Do you not see that your interpretation goes against the rules? This game is already not getting much action on BGA, implementing the game wrong (against the official rules) and refusing to fix the implementation may not be a good strategy to change that.
"If a player has a palace bordering a city wall space with a wall component and any player rebuilds this wall at a later point in time so that it borders this palace, the owner of the palace also receives the corresponding tower tile."
Let's break this down:
1) "If a player has a palace bordering a city wall space with a wall component ... "
If a player has a palace bordering a city wall space with a wall component that player should receive the tower tile as per the rules. That player may later lose that tower tile, as it happened w/ red in this game.
2) "... and any player rebuilds this wall *** at a later point in time so that it borders this palace ***..."
This too happened in this game, when after having lost the tower tile the red player rebuilt the wall again touching his palace for a second time.
3) "the owner of the palace also receives the corresponding tower tile."
Therefore the red player, after having rebuilt the wall "so that it borders this palace " (exactly as it is written in the rule) should "also receives the corresponding tower tile".
The implementation, as it stands, is not following part 2 above because it's not awarding the owner of the palace the corresponding tower tile when the wall is rebuilt AT A LATER POINT IN TIME SO THAT IT BORDERS THIS PALACE again.
If your interpretation were correct in that a palace that was already connected can't receive the tower tile again at a later point in time, the rules wouldn't clearly state "any player rebuilds this wall >>> at a later point in time <<< so that it borders this palace the owner of the palace also receives the corresponding tower tile".
I don't know how to better explain the obvious. Do you not see that your interpretation goes against the rules? This game is already not getting much action on BGA, implementing the game wrong (against the official rules) and refusing to fix the implementation may not be a good strategy to change that.
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
Lisää tähän mitä tahansa, minkä katsot oleelliseksi tämän bugin toisintamiseksi tai ehdotuksesi ymmärtämiseksi:
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
