#86908: "Able to go back after playing Assertion card and seeing what Base Conservation Project opponent took"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Tarkka kuvaus
-
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
-
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
Raportin historia
The second player to do so should NOT be able to do a take-back if the Conservation Project card is still in the opponent's hand.
I dunno where a discarded base conservation project goes to.
The discard pile? Back to the base conservation projects pile to be potentially drawn again?
My intuition is that it goes into a separate discard pile for Base Conservation Projects.
I feel this way because that's what I do with final scoring cards in a 4 player game, which becomes relevant when both cards with Resistance get played, and resultantly, during the course of the game we need to draw more Final Scoring cards than exist in the deck.
Note that this could result in the top of the discard deck showing a different back in rare cases, and players just need to do a random selection method (such as shuffling) without looking -- the same as pilfering from a hand that contains a base conservation project.
About your main point, it does seem to me that the second player shouldn't get a take-back because they can deduce the taken conservation project. However, it is a very minor edge case:
* Two DIFFERENT players must both get Assertion animals (there are only two of these in the game).
* The second player must play their Assertion animal before the first player plays their project.
* Even if this very rare case happens, in most cases I suspect it is obvious which project the first player wants, e.g. they have 4 Asia icons and the Asia project is not visible.
I think perhaps this bug is not fixed
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
