#95801: "Objective abundant not scored properly"
Mitä tämä raportti koskee?
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Tarkka kuvaus
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
Still in game...• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
Still in game...• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
Still in game...• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
Still in game...• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
Still in game...• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
Still in game...• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v112
Raportin historia
Move #51
Progression 86%
Opulent still works the old way - i.e. opponent sold a building but it still counted for Gold spent. Cost me the game!!
Thank you
Move #46
Progression 57%
Still counting sold buildings for the Opulent objective
Move #53
Progression 57%
Opulent Did work as intended. Which surprised us as it hadn't worked last game!!
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.