#100998: "The selection of gurus by the number of games played generates a representativeness bias"
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta
Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta
Jos kyllä, ole ystävällinen ja ÄÄNESTÄ tätä raporttia. Eniten ääniä saaneet raportit laitetaan ETUSIJALLE!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Tarkka kuvaus
• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
-• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
These are Gurus who select the game configuration for arena seasons - Great idea !
Gurus are selected because they play one specific game a lot on BGA plateform - of course !
When a game offers different configurations for the number of players, games with few players are faster and therefore more numerous than those with many players. - Obvious !
Also the probability of becoming a Guru is greater if a player prefer to play short games than long games, because the selection is based on the number of games completed during a period.
Finally, over seasons, the games configurations (chosen by Gurus) will be shorter and shorter, with fewer players, even if the games concerned are richer in configuration with more players.
I think this can be considered as a problem/bug, because some good players (who like big setups) might lose interest in seasons, as we can see in some comments.
May be a more representative selection of Gurus should be established
Proposal : In a game with possible configurations for 2, 3 or 4 players, select 1/3 of the Gurus on their greatest number of games completed at 2 players, 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 3 players and 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 4 (taking into account duplicate players).
Thanks for reading me.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
-• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
These are Gurus who select the game configuration for arena seasons - Great idea !
Gurus are selected because they play one specific game a lot on BGA plateform - of course !
When a game offers different configurations for the number of players, games with few players are faster and therefore more numerous than those with many players. - Obvious !
Also the probability of becoming a Guru is greater if a player prefer to play short games than long games, because the selection is based on the number of games completed during a period.
Finally, over seasons, the games configurations (chosen by Gurus) will be shorter and shorter, with fewer players, even if the games concerned are richer in configuration with more players.
I think this can be considered as a problem/bug, because some good players (who like big setups) might lose interest in seasons, as we can see in some comments.
May be a more representative selection of Gurus should be established
Proposal : In a game with possible configurations for 2, 3 or 4 players, select 1/3 of the Gurus on their greatest number of games completed at 2 players, 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 3 players and 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 4 (taking into account duplicate players).
Thanks for reading me.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
-• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
-• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
-• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
These are Gurus who select the game configuration for arena seasons - Great idea !
Gurus are selected because they play one specific game a lot on BGA plateform - of course !
When a game offers different configurations for the number of players, games with few players are faster and therefore more numerous than those with many players. - Obvious !
Also the probability of becoming a Guru is greater if a player prefer to play short games than long games, because the selection is based on the number of games completed during a period.
Finally, over seasons, the games configurations (chosen by Gurus) will be shorter and shorter, with fewer players, even if the games concerned are richer in configuration with more players.
I think this can be considered as a problem/bug, because some good players (who like big setups) might lose interest in seasons, as we can see in some comments.
May be a more representative selection of Gurus should be established
Proposal : In a game with possible configurations for 2, 3 or 4 players, select 1/3 of the Gurus on their greatest number of games completed at 2 players, 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 3 players and 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 4 (taking into account duplicate players).
Thanks for reading me.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
-• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
These are Gurus who select the game configuration for arena seasons - Great idea !
Gurus are selected because they play one specific game a lot on BGA plateform - of course !
When a game offers different configurations for the number of players, games with few players are faster and therefore more numerous than those with many players. - Obvious !
Also the probability of becoming a Guru is greater if a player prefer to play short games than long games, because the selection is based on the number of games completed during a period.
Finally, over seasons, the games configurations (chosen by Gurus) will be shorter and shorter, with fewer players, even if the games concerned are richer in configuration with more players.
I think this can be considered as a problem/bug, because some good players (who like big setups) might lose interest in seasons, as we can see in some comments.
May be a more representative selection of Gurus should be established
Proposal : In a game with possible configurations for 2, 3 or 4 players, select 1/3 of the Gurus on their greatest number of games completed at 2 players, 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 3 players and 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 4 (taking into account duplicate players).
Thanks for reading me.
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
-• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
These are Gurus who select the game configuration for arena seasons - Great idea !
Gurus are selected because they play one specific game a lot on BGA plateform - of course !
When a game offers different configurations for the number of players, games with few players are faster and therefore more numerous than those with many players. - Obvious !
Also the probability of becoming a Guru is greater if a player prefer to play short games than long games, because the selection is based on the number of games completed during a period.
Finally, over seasons, the games configurations (chosen by Gurus) will be shorter and shorter, with fewer players, even if the games concerned are richer in configuration with more players.
I think this can be considered as a problem/bug, because some good players (who like big setups) might lose interest in seasons, as we can see in some comments.
May be a more representative selection of Gurus should be established
Proposal : In a game with possible configurations for 2, 3 or 4 players, select 1/3 of the Gurus on their greatest number of games completed at 2 players, 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 3 players and 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 4 (taking into account duplicate players).
Thanks for reading me.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
-• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
-• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
These are Gurus who select the game configuration for arena seasons - Great idea !
Gurus are selected because they play one specific game a lot on BGA plateform - of course !
When a game offers different configurations for the number of players, games with few players are faster and therefore more numerous than those with many players. - Obvious !
Also the probability of becoming a Guru is greater if a player prefer to play short games than long games, because the selection is based on the number of games completed during a period.
Finally, over seasons, the games configurations (chosen by Gurus) will be shorter and shorter, with fewer players, even if the games concerned are richer in configuration with more players.
I think this can be considered as a problem/bug, because some good players (who like big setups) might lose interest in seasons, as we can see in some comments.
May be a more representative selection of Gurus should be established
Proposal : In a game with possible configurations for 2, 3 or 4 players, select 1/3 of the Gurus on their greatest number of games completed at 2 players, 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 3 players and 1/3 on the greatest number of games completed at 4 (taking into account duplicate players).
Thanks for reading me.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
-• Mikä on selaimesi?
Google Chrome v117
Raportin historia
You seem to misunderstand how gurus work.
You can be a guru without playing in the arena so people playing the game in various configurations CAN be represented.
But it is true that many experienced players only play or mostly play in Arena mode and they might pass for a season if they don't like the configuration which creates an unwelcome form of inertia.
Perhaps games with more players should count for a bit more as they take more time ?
I don't think that forcing other players counts to be represented would be a good idea.
-------------------
You aren't more likely to become a guru in a short game because the number of games required to play to become a guru depends on how many times the other players play the game.
I have once been a guru for a game (Expedition Northwest) for playing a single game in that season and I didn't even have 100 ELO.
----------------
It is also true that making gurus only those who play the game a lot creates a bias.
I think that there should be a certain randomness to it to create representativity :
- on top of the players selected for having played the most, some players should be selected randomly at some specific time before the end of the season. There would be a minimum requirement like having finished 2 games within the season, excluding "friendly" games.
All in all, I don't think it is a very important issue but it is an issue.
Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin
- Toinen pöydän tunnus / siirron numero
- Ratkaisiko F5 ongelman?
- Ilmestyykö ongelma useita kertoja? Joka kerta? Satunnaisesti?
- Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.