#102230: "Return of the joint endgame"

• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvankaappaus tästä bugista, voit käyttää Imgur.com:a sen lähettämiseksi. Kopioi ja liitä linkki tähän.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Mikä on selaimesi?
Mozilla v5

Mitä tämä raportti koskee?

Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta

Mitä tapahtui? Valitse alta

Ennen ilmoituksen tekoa, tarkista onko sellainen jo olemassa samasta aiheesta

Tarkka kuvaus

Raportin historia

Lisää jotain tähän raporttiin

Vaihda raportin tilanne:

Ohje

Tue

Seuraa meitä