• Kopioi/liitä virheilmoitus näytöltäsi, jos sait sellaisen.

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Selitä mitä halusit tehdä, mitä teit ja mitä tapahtui

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä näytöllä näkyi kun olit estettynä (Tyhjä ruutu? Osa pelin käyttöliittymästä? Virheilmoitus?)

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Mitä osaa säännöistä BGA:n sovellus ei noudattanut

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Onko sääntörikkomus nähtävillä pelin toistossa? Jos kyllä, mikä on siirron numero?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Minkä pelin toiminnon halusit suorittaa?

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Mitä yritit tehdä tämän pelitoiminnon käynnistymiseksi?

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Missä vaiheessa peliä ongelma ilmeni (mikä oli silloinen pelin ohje)?

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Mitä tapahtui kun yritit tehdä tämän pelin toiminnon (virheilmoitus, pelin tilapalkin viesti, ...)?

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Kuvaile näyttöongelmaa. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän.

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Ole hyvä ja kopioi teksti englanniksi oman kielesi sijasta. Jos sinulla on kuvakaappaus tästä bugista (hyvä käytäntö), voit käyttää valitsemaasi kuvien isännöintipalvelua (snipboard.io ladataksesi sen ja kopioidaksesi/liittääksesi linkin tähän. Onko tämä teksti saatavilla käännösjärjestelmässä? Jos on, onko sen käännöksestä yli 24 tuntia?

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Mikä on selaimesi?

• Selitä ehdotuksesti tarkasti ja ytimekkäästi, jotta se on ymmärrettävissä niin helposti kuin mahdollista.

When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.

• Mikä on selaimesi?